Energy and infrastructure projects combine long-lived physical assets with regulatory rights and complex contractual relationships. Economic value may be concentrated in the technical asset, a concession, secured grid access or contracted payments. The balance depends on technology, jurisdiction, project phase and financing.
A transaction review should bring these layers together. A technically sound project may be impaired by short remaining rights or unresolved consents, while a long-term offtake agreement has limited value if availability and maintenance cannot be sustained.
Transaction perimeter and project company
Projects are often held through special-purpose vehicles, although this is not universal. The review should establish which assets, land, rights, contracts, liabilities and security interests sit in each entity. In a share transaction, the company generally remains the contracting party, but change-of-control provisions, consent rights and regulatory approvals may still apply.
Concessions, permits and remaining term
Concessions, water rights, construction permits, environmental obligations, grid-access rights and operating licences often form a central part of the project foundation. Their duration, renewal, transferability and revocation risk should align with the business case. Modernisation, environmental protection, minimum-flow or decommissioning obligations may also create material costs.
Revenue model and counterparties
Revenue may arise from regulated tariffs, offtake agreements, availability payments, user charges or market exposure. Price formulae, indexation, term, volume and availability requirements, counterparty credit, termination and adjustment rights should be examined. Where revenue is market-linked, the basis of forecasts and the project's capacity to absorb volatility are central.
Technical condition and lifecycle
Technical due diligence considers condition, performance, availability, maintenance, spare-parts support and remaining useful life. It should also test whether historical production and outages reconcile with the financial model. For older assets, modernisation, safety requirements and potential efficiency improvements require separate assessment.
Financing and distributions
Project finance arrangements often contain extensive security, account structures, covenants and consent requirements. Positive operating cash flow does not necessarily mean cash is available for distribution. Debt service, reserve accounts, maintenance budgets and distribution tests need to be represented correctly.
Environment, decommissioning and long-term obligations
Decommissioning, restoration, waste management and long-term monitoring may continue beyond the operating period. The review should consider whether provisions, guarantees or dedicated funds are adequate and who bears the obligation after completion. Climate exposure, water availability and extreme events may further affect resilience, depending on the technology.
Translating findings into the transaction
Findings may affect price mechanisms, warranties, indemnities, consent conditions and transition arrangements. K.E.W Strategy Management coordinates the commercial and transaction analysis. Technical, regulatory, legal, tax and environmental reviews should be carried out by qualified specialists.
Key review questions
- Which rights and contracts support operations, and how long do they remain in force?
- Which consents are triggered by a change of ownership?
- Do technical availability and production history reconcile with the financial model?
- What modernisation, maintenance and decommissioning costs are expected?
- What restrictions arise from financing and regulation?
Context
Project structure and risk allocation vary materially by technology and jurisdiction. This article is a general overview and does not replace a technical, regulatory, legal, tax or financial review.
More about our work on energy and infrastructure projects
