For an industrial company, the historical income statement is only the starting point. A buyer needs to know whether customer relationships, production knowledge, employees, plant and supply chains will continue to function after completion. A strong margin may depend on a small number of orders, key individuals or heavily utilised equipment and may therefore be less robust than it first appears.
The review should connect the numbers with the operating reality. Only once the causes of earnings are understood can their transferability be assessed.
Earnings quality rather than a snapshot
Revenue and EBITDA should be analysed by product, customer, site and order type. Recurring demand, price pass-through, raw-material volatility, scrap, rework, warranties and capacity utilisation all matter. One-off items, owner-related costs, deferred maintenance or unusually favourable procurement may distort reported earnings.
Customer and order profile
High customer concentration is not automatically negative, but it increases the importance of each relationship. Contract terms, call-off patterns, termination rights, pricing mechanisms, quality agreements and the strength of the underlying relationship should be reviewed. A central question is whether customer ties belong to the organisation or depend almost entirely on the current owner.
Production capability and asset condition
An asset register says little about actual capability. Age, maintenance, availability, bottlenecks, tooling, setup times, scrap rates and spare-parts support determine operating capacity. Unplanned capital expenditure needed to meet quality, safety or environmental requirements may increase post-completion funding needs.
Knowledge, key people and transition
In many mid-sized companies, critical knowledge is only partly documented. Costing, programming, customer approvals, supplier selection and quality decisions may depend on a few individuals. A continuity assessment identifies which roles need to be retained, replaced or secured through a structured transition period.
Supply chain and working capital
Procurement risk may arise from single-source supply, long lead times, minimum order quantities, volatile pricing or customer-specific materials. Working capital tied up in inventory, work in progress and receivables also needs to be understood. Seasonal or project-based businesses may require materially more funding than a single balance-sheet date suggests.
Legal, quality and environmental matters
Permits, product certifications, occupational safety, environmental requirements, product liability and export controls may be essential to continuity. In a share deal, contracts and employment relationships generally remain with the same company, although change-of-control provisions and regulatory consents require separate review. Asset transactions may involve contractual assumptions and statutory transfers.
Reflecting findings in transaction terms
Dependencies may influence price, warranties, indemnities, transition services and completion conditions. K.E.W Strategy Management consolidates the commercial and transaction findings. Technical, legal, tax, employment and environmental reviews remain the responsibility of appropriately qualified specialists.
Key review questions
- Which customers, products and orders support earnings and utilisation?
- What capital expenditure is required for safe continuity and growth?
- Where does the business depend on the owner, key staff, suppliers or individual machines?
- Are costing, quality and production knowledge properly documented?
- What is the normal working-capital requirement across a full business cycle?
Context
The relevant value drivers vary by subsector, production depth, customer profile and business model. This article does not replace a technical, legal, tax or financial review of a specific company.
More about our work with industrial and manufacturing companies
